European
regulators have asked Google's rivals whether the Internet search
engine's revised proposals to settle an antitrust case will boost their
bargaining power in commercial negotiations, a European Commission
document showed.
Google has promised to post
more prominent links to rival shopping, travel and restaurant sites when
a user searches for content, as well as reduce the minimum price
advertisers can offer to pay for paid ads.
Google
is seeking to end a three-year old investigation by the European
Commission and avert a fine that could be as high as $5 billion for
blocking competitors in search results.
Google's first proposal in April was rejected by its competitors, including Microsoft and British price comparison site Foundem.
The
EU antitrust authority said last month that it would seek feedback from
125 rivals and third parties to Google's latest offer.
The
Commission has asked rivals whether the new links which Google has
planned ensure sufficient visibility and would prompt users to click on
them more frequently, a four-page questionnaire sent to rivals showed.
Competitors
were also quizzed on the mechanism Google will use to rank high and
low-quality links to outside content. Such technical issues are key to
where online retailers or travel websites show up in Google search
results, and can greatly affect traffic to their services.
On
Google's proposal to give rivals more control over what it can copy
from their websites, in a practice known as scraping, the Commission
asked if the companies think the opt-out mechanism was sufficient.
"In
your opinion, will the opt out possibilities.... improve your
bargaining power in discussions with Google?" the document reads.
A
spokesman for Google did not return a request for comment. The
Commission's spokesman for competition policy, Antoine Colombani,
declined to comment.
Source : Reuters
Image : Reuters
Slider
Windows
Apple | Mac
‹
›
Linux
Mobile
Hardware
Tutorial
Android
Home
»
Google
»
News
»
Security
» Google rivals asked if concessions go far enough in antitrust inquiry
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments